|
Under the POSH Act, 2013, it is not mandatory to include union office bearers or representatives in the Internal Committee (IC). The Act's intent and structure emphasize that the IC is designed to address sexual harassment issues in a focused and impartial manner, distinct from the functions and objectives of a workers' union. Here is a detailed explanation:
Purpose and Objectives 1. Union's Objective:
Legal Framework of the IC under Section 4 of the POSH Act
Analysis of Union Representation 1. No Legal Provision for Union Representation:
Key Roles and Responsibilities of the IC
Conclusion The POSH Act, 2013, is explicit in its provisions that the IC's composition is determined solely by the employer in compliance with the Act's criteria. While unions play a vital role in protecting worker rights, their collective bargaining approach is fundamentally different from the IC's mandate of addressing and preventing sexual harassment. Union members may be nominated to the IC only if they meet the eligibility requirements under Section 4(2) and are selected by the employer. However, unions cannot legally demand representation in the IC.
Disclaimer: This document is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
1 Comment
Madhumathi
9/15/2025 04:15:00 am
Union representation in the Internal Committee (IC) under the POSH Act, 2013 is not mandatory. The IC’s composition is strictly defined in Section 4, and members are nominated by the employer. A union member may be included only if they meet the eligibility criteria, but unions cannot demand representation as a matter of right.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Categories
All
HR BooksSocial Work Books |
||||||||

RSS Feed