Under the POSH Act, 2013, having a single Internal Committee (IC) for three offices in Bangalore, each with 20+ employees, would not be compliant with the law. Here's why:
1. Definition of Workplace (Section 2(o)(ii) of the POSH Act): The definition of a “workplace” under the POSH Act is quite broad and includes not just the main office but any branch, unit, or location where employees carry out the company’s business. This section defines a workplace as:
2. Obligation to Constitute an Internal Committee (Section 4(1)):
This section of the POSH Act states that every employer must form an Internal Committee (IC) for every workplace. The IC is responsible for handling complaints of sexual harassment and ensuring a safe work environment. The proviso to Section 4(1) makes this obligation clearer:
3. Why a Single IC is Not Compliant: A single Internal Committee overseeing all three offices would not comply with the law for the following reasons:
4. The Importance of Independent Internal Committees:
5. Conclusion: Given the above provisions of the POSH Act, each office must have its own Internal Committee, regardless of whether they are part of the same company or located within the same city. In this case, the company’s three offices in Bangalore should each have their own independent Internal Committee to comply with the POSH Act. A single IC for all three offices would be non-compliant, as it does not meet the requirement for having an IC for each distinct workplace.
Disclaimer: This document is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Categories
All
Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace (PoSH)Stay updated and informed by joining our WhatsApp group for HR and Employment Law Classes - Every Fortnight. The Zoom link for the sessions will be shared directly in the group.
PoSH Nirathanka
50,000 HR PROFESSIONALS ARE CONNECTED THROUGH OUR NIRATHANKA HR GROUPS.
YOU CAN ALSO JOIN AND PARTICIPATE IN OUR GROUP DISCUSSIONS. |