|
Under the POSH Act, 2013, a complaint of sexual harassment can still be valid even if it arises after an adverse employment decision, such as the denial of an increment due to poor performance, provided that the complaint is related to circumstances outlined in Section 3(2) of the Act. To determine the validity of the complaint, it is crucial to examine whether the adverse decision or the environment was linked to sexual harassment, as described in the law.
Key points from Section 3(2) of the POSH Act, 2013: 1. Preferential or Detrimental Treatment:
0 Comments
In the context of Section 2(n) of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act), the term "unwelcome" is a critical aspect of defining sexual harassment. It refers to any behaviour, act, or conduct that is not solicited or invited by the recipient and is regarded as offensive or unwanted by them.
Explanation of "Unwelcome" For an act to be classified as sexual harassment under the POSH Act, the behaviour in question must be unwelcome to the recipient. The key elements are:
Under the provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Prohibition and Redressal) Act (POSH Act, 2013), a husband can file a sexual harassment complaint on behalf of his wife under specific circumstances. this by breaking down the relevant sections of the Act as below:
1. Who is an Aggrieved Woman? As per Section 2(a) of the POSH Act:
2. Who is the Respondent? As per Section 2(m), the "respondent" is the person against whom the aggrieved woman (wife) has filed a complaint. This person is the alleged perpetrator of the sexual harassment.
Yes, the sexual harassment complaint would be valid if the incident occurred during a training program outside the workplace, provided the following conditions are met:
1. Training Program Sponsored by the Company: If the training program was organized or sponsored by the company and it was part of the employee’s job responsibilities, it falls under the "course of employment." This means that even though the incident happened outside the physical office, the location qualifies as a workplace under Section 2(o)(iv) of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
Yes, even if a company has no female employees, it is still required to form an Internal Committee (IC) under the POSH Act, 2013. This is because the act is designed to protect all women who may visit or engage with the workplace, not just employees. Here's why:
1. Scope of the Act: The POSH Act is aimed at preventing and addressing sexual harassment against women in the workplace, as highlighted in the preamble of the act. The protection is not limited to female employees; it extends to any woman who may visit the workplace, whether as a client, vendor, or any other role. 2. Definition of 'Aggrieved Woman': Section 2(a) defines an 'aggrieved woman' as someone who alleges sexual harassment, regardless of whether she is employed by the organization. This includes any woman of any age who comes into contact with the workplace, reinforcing that the act covers women beyond the company's employees.
Under the POSH Act, 2013, having a single Internal Committee (IC) for three offices in Bangalore, each with 20+ employees, would not be compliant with the law. Here's why:
1. Definition of Workplace (Section 2(o)(ii) of the POSH Act): The definition of a “workplace” under the POSH Act is quite broad and includes not just the main office but any branch, unit, or location where employees carry out the company’s business. This section defines a workplace as:
Yes, an external member of the Internal Committee under the Sexual Harassment Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 [POSH Act, 2013] can be a lawyer, even if they are not associated with a Non-Governmental Organization, provided they meet the required criteria outlined in the law.
1. POSH Act, 2013 - Provisions Related to External Members The POSH Act, 2013 requires that every organization with more than 10 employees establish an Internal Committee to address complaints of sexual harassment. The Internal Committee must consist of:
The external member of the Internal Committee (IC) constituted under the POSH Act, 2013, can continue to serve on the committee for more than 3 years, but not continuously without reappointment. Let's break down the answer in detail:
Legal Provision (Section 4(3) of the POSH Act, 2013): Section 4(3) of the POSH Act states that the Presiding Officer and every member of the Internal Committee, including the external member, shall hold office for a term not exceeding three years from the date of their nomination. This tenure limit applies equally to all members, whether internal employees or the external member from a non-governmental organization (NGO) or someone experienced in issues related to sexual harassment. Tenure Limit:
Section 4 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (commonly referred to as the POSH Act,
2013) focuses on the Constitution of the Internal Committee (IC), which is a mandatory body for employers to establish in every workplace for addressing complaints related to sexual harassment. Subsection (1): Mandatory Formation of the IC
Yes, a woman can file a sexual harassment complaint against another woman under The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
Legal Basis: Definition of Aggrieved Woman (Section 2(a))
Definition of Sexual Harassment (Section 2(n))
Yes, an Internal Committee's (IC) inquiry under the POSH Act, 2013, would be invalid if the respondent is not given a copy of the complaint. This is based on the principles of natural justice and the statutory provisions of the Act and Rules.
Legal Basis for the Requirement 1. Rule 7(2) of the POSH Rules, 2013: It explicitly states that upon receiving the complaint, the Complaints Committee (IC or LC) must send a copy to the respondent within seven working days. 2. Rule 7(3) of the POSH Rules, 2013: The respondent is required to file a reply along with supporting documents, list of witnesses, etc., within ten working days from the receipt of the complaint. 3. Section 11(1) of the POSH Act, 2013: The inquiry must follow the service rules applicable to the respondent, or in the absence of such rules, follow prescribed procedures. 4. Section 11(3) of the POSH Act, 2013: The IC has powers akin to a civil court for summoning, enforcing attendance, and requiring discovery and production of documents. 5. Rule 7(4) of the POSH Rules, 2013: The inquiry must be conducted in accordance with the principles of natural justice. Denying the respondent a copy of the complaint violates the right to a fair hearing. The Madras High Court has firmly held that any unwelcome actions or words causing discomfort to women at the workplace constitute sexual harassment under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 (PoSH Act). Justice R.N. Manjula, delivering the judgment, quashed a Labour Court order that had set aside findings of an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) in a case involving complaints of sexual harassment in a corporate environment.
Background of the Case The case involved allegations of inappropriate behavior by a senior employee against multiple female colleagues. Complaints included unwelcome physical gestures, intrusive questions, and remarks that caused the complainants discomfort and embarrassment. The allegations were investigated by the ICC, which found that the accused had violated workplace conduct standards and recommended several corrective measures, including: 1. Issuing a final warning. 2. Removing the accused from supervisory roles. 3. Limiting his assignments to domestic locations. 4. Suspending pay raises and related benefits for two years. For more details kindly click the below link: https://lawtrend.in/unwelcome-acts-or-words-making-women-uncomfortable-at-work-constitute-sexual-harassment-madras-high-court/ Courtesy: Law Trend 23 January 2025 Join Our Posh LinkedIn page: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/prevention-of-sexual-harassment-at-workplace-posh/?viewAsMember=true Follow PoSH at Work WhatsApp Channel by clicking the below link: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9OMCUCxoB4LQG1aV3A According to sources, the female guard has alleged that the chief security officer sexually harassed her and hurled casteist remarks when she went to meet him regarding her duty roster.
Representative image where the words 'Stop violence against women' can be seen Credit: iStock Photo New Delhi: A female guard at AIIMS-Delhi has accused its chief security officer of sexual harassment and caste discrimination, prompting the premier medical institute to initiate a probe into the allegations. Ola driver is employee, POSH Act applicable: Karnataka High Court on Sexual Harassment Case10/2/2024 The petitioner woman had questioned the stand taken by the Internal Complaint Committee (ICC) of ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd (Ola) not taking action against the driver as laid down under the PoSH Act. Bengaluru: In a significant judgment, the Karnataka High Court has held that under the provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Work place (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (PoSH Act), a driver-subscriber is an ‘employee’ of the transport aggregator, Ola in the instant case.
Justice M G S Kamal passed this order while partly allowing the petition filed by a Bengaluru woman, who was harassed by a driver under the Ola platform. The petitioner woman had questioned the stand taken by the Internal Complaint Committee (ICC) oof ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd (Ola) not taking action against the driver as laid down under the PoSH Act. Speaking to TNIE, a top official said that the two issues of tackling sexual harassment and drug menace were discussed in detail in a meeting chaired by Chief Secretary N Muruganandam. CHENNAI: The Tamil Nadu government on Monday directed all higher education institutes to ensure compliance under the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act and take proactive measures to tackle drug menace on campuses.
The instructions were given during a meeting chaired by Chief Secretary N Muruganandam, in the presence of DGP Shankar Jiwal, other senior police officers and secretaries of various departments, in the wake of the raids by Tambaram police on apartments near a private college in Potheri on Saturday, the sexual harassment incident at NIT-Tiruchy last week, and the child sexual abuse cases at a fake NCC camp in Krishnagiri district last month. Speaking to TNIE, a top official said that the two issues of tackling sexual harassment and drug menace were discussed in detail. The court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Rahul Garg also dismissed the discharge application filed by Singh, the complainant's counsel Deepanshu Bansal said.
Chandigarh: A court on Monday framed charges against former Haryana minister and BJP leader Sandeep Singh in an alleged sexual harassment case registered on the complaint of a junior woman coach. The court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Rahul Garg also dismissed the the discharge application filed by Singh, the complainant's counsel Deepanshu Bansal said. The charges have been framed against Singh under Indian Penal Code sections 354 (assault or use of criminal force against a woman with intent to outrage her modesty), 354A (sexual harassment), 354B (assault or criminal force with intent to disrobe), ... 506 (criminal intimidation) and 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of woman), Bansal said. The accused, a resident of Sakinaka, has been booked under Sections 74 (molestation), 75 (sexual harassment) and 76 (use of criminal force to woman with intent to disrobe) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS). No arrest has been made in the case yet.
A man working for an Andheri-based private finance company has been booked for allegedly molesting a 24-year-old employee working in the same firm during an office outing in Kondeshwar, Badlapur. In its recent judgment in Aureliano Fernandes vs. State of Goa and Others, the Supreme Court of India, observed that even after a decade of the prevention of sexual harassment law being formulated – the implementation and enforcement is still inadequate. Lack of procedural awareness; lack of confidence in the process and outcome; lack of strict adherence to the enforcement regime and other practical challenges are the main reasons. 'However salutary this enactment may be, it will never succeed i in providing dignity and respect that women deserve at the workplace unless there is strict adherence to the enforcement regime and a proactive approach by all State and non-State actors' the Court observed.
The court said when a plea is taken of false implication for extraneous reasons, the courts have a duty to make deeper scrutiny of the evidence and decide acceptability or otherwise of the accusations, in order to separate the chaff from the grain.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday said a deeper scrutiny of charges of sexual harassment at workplace is to be undertaken when a plea of false accusation is made as the charge of this nature is very easy to make and very difficult to rebut. On its part, the company’s chief human resource officer has said an investigation into the case will be taken up on priority and that the company will arrive at a fair conclusion. A male employee of a Bengaluru-based mobile marketing company has accused one of the product managers of the organisation of sexual harassment at ‘workplace’. The victim, an intern in the company, has shared an email addressed to the management of the company about the details of the incident on X, which has now gone viral.
On its part, the company’s chief human resource officer has said an investigation into the case will be taken up on priority and that the company will arrive at a fair conclusion in less than the legal timeline for such matters. While dealing with a case of sexual harassment of a woman air force personnel by another air force personnel, the Madras High Court directed the Centre Government to ensure that a proper Internal Complaints Committee existed in the Armed Forces in compliance with the Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Work Act. The court also directed the Central Government to sensitise the armed personnel by imparting gender-sensitive awareness training to achieve the objectives of the legislation.
Also Read - Madras High Court Chief Justice Assured Portraits Of BR Ambedkar Will Not Be Removed From Courts: Tamil Nadu Govt And the Central Government is directed to ensure the proper existence of Internal Complaints Committee in the Armed Forces in accordance with the mandates of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013 and to sensitise the armed personnel imparting gender sensitive awareness training to achieve its objectives. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed,” the court directed. The Calcutta High Court has recently held that the actions of an accused under the Prevention of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (“POSH Act”), in being party to an appraisal report of the complainant thereunder, “vitiates and makes a mockery of the entire process.”
In hearing a contempt application filed by the complainant/petitioner against the accused, his company and its agents, a single-bench of Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya directed the respondents/contemnors to prove that they had not been in “contumacious violation” of the Court’s orders, and that the impugned appraisal report was unconnected to the charges under the POSH Act, invoked by the petitioner against the accused/contemnor no 5. It was held: For more details kindly click the below link: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/calcutta-high-court/calcutta-high-court-posh-workplace-sexual-harassment-accused-participation-appraisal-complainant-232651 Courtesy: LiveLaw July 13, 2023 Join Our HR WhatsApp Group: https://lnkd.in/gpyaXnk4 Join Our Posh LinkedIn page: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/prevention-of-sexual-harassment-at-workplace-posh/?viewAsMember=true The court said equalising of sexes in every aspect of life is a constitutional imperative and the working environment is required to be as safe and secure for women. The Delhi High Court has held that there is "absolutely nothing" that limits the scope of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (SHW Act) to cases where a woman employee is sexually harassed by ...
The court said equalising of sexes in every aspect of life is a constitutional imperative and the working environment is required to be as safe and secure for women as it is for men. "Even an apprehension, by a woman, that her safety might be compromised or endangered in the workplace is, therefore, abhorrent to our constitutional ethos," it said. Panaji: To fulfil the promise that the Prevention of Sexual Harassment at the Workplace (POSH) Act holds out to working women all over the country, the Supreme Court has directed the Union government and all state governments to undertake a time-bound exercise to verify whether all the ministries, departments, government organisations, authorities, public sector undertakings, institutions, and bodies have constituted sexual harassment committees.
The Supreme Court passed the order on a petition filed by former head of department of Goa University, Aureliano Fernandes, who had challenged his dismissal by the GU in 2010 following complaints by student of alleged physical harassment. His appeal was dismissed by the high court in 2012, and he subsequently approached the SC. Assistant Superintendent of Police, Aligarh, said an investigation into the case is underway. No one has been arrested so far.
A PhD student at Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) has accused a professor of sexually harassing her. A PhD student at Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) has accused a professor of sexually harassing her. The police said an FIR has been lodged against the professor under Indian Penal Code (IPC) section 354 (assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty) after the woman lodged a complaint Saturday. Puneet Dwivedi, Assistant Superintendent of Police, Aligarh, said an investigation into the case is underway. No one has been arrested so far. |
|
RSS Feed
